Quote:
Originally Posted by Juan
For Heyman, if a guy isn't featured on Raw then he is a failure.
|
No, I do not think like that.
I do however, think that if someone is NOT on RAW, then there's no way that the WWE will ever 'market' that guy as being the #1 guy in the company (unless they are a long time veteran like Undertaker).
Again - there's a reason why the RAW World Heavyweight belt is usually the LAST match at Wrestlemania. The only time Smackdown has the last match at Mania, is when Taker is involved in the main-event.
The one and *only* time that RAW and Smackdown were on par (according to the WWE and how they booked things), was in 2003 when Angle and Lesnar main-evented...and again, the only reason why that happened, was because Lesnar had become positioned as the #1 guy in the company....since he had done numerous things which involved a CLEAN PINFALL VICTORY over The Rock.