[taker707]

Originally Posted by Xero You know, this all sounds an awful lot like WCW... WCW: Started as the NWA, then found its own identity. TNA: Started as the NWA, then found its own identity. WCW: Had issues with the NWA Championship, so dropped it. TNA: Had issues with the NWA Championship, so dropped it. WCW: Run by a billionaire who would put anything into the company. TNA: Run by a billionaire who will put anything into the company. WCW: Ran in a small soundstage in Orlando. TNA: Runs in a small soundstage in Orlando. WCW: Takes talent from the WWF, ECW and Japan to supplement its roster. TNA: Takes talent from WWE, ROH and Japan to supplement its roster. WCW: "Innovative" (read: dumb) gimmick matches. TNA: "Innovative" (read: dumb) gimmick matches. WCW: Awesome undercard, terrible main event. TNA: Awesome undercard, terrible main event. WCW: Bad booking. See: Vince Russo. TNA: Bad booking. See: Vince Russo. WCW: Hulk Hogan had power over all of WCW. TNA: Hulk Hogan has power over all of TNA. Yeah, this isn't WCW 2.0. This isn't WCW 2.0 at all.

all very very true . But what was the one thing that really killed WCW . the AOL merger. I dont see this kind of thing happening to TNA . Plus the Carter's arent out to kill Mcmahon like WCW was