Quote:
Originally Posted by GimmickInfringed
Kane as world champion....doesn't fit though....Austin was too over at the time...
|
I agree with you saying Austin was way over, but Foley held the belt a couple of different times in 1999 when Austin was on fire. I just think Kane would have been a more believeable champion than Foley, Kane has that unstoppable monster quality, especially back then. It could have been real big. WWE choosing Kane as the first guy to take the belt off of Austin in 1998 really says something, even if it was for only a day.