[Juan]

Originally Posted by CWK I view the term wrestler as one who knows holds and can execute them very well as in a Chris Benoit or a Bret Hart. Guys who can have a wrestling match. I don't view Foley as a wrestler at all. If the name of the poll was "better performer" I would be more likely to vote Foley in many cases because performer to me is not just limited to wrestling, its comedy, drama, microphone work and just overall entertainment. Do I think Foley is a better "performer" than Vader? Hell yes. Do I think Foley is a better "wrestler" than Vader? Absolutely not. Foley was just in the right place at the right time in the attitude era where his particular style shined. Justifying this would be flashing back to the early 90's when Foley and Vader both wrestled in WCW. Vader was the champ, a believeable one and was headlining PPV's with Flair and Sting. Yes Vader and Foley feuded in WCW, but Vader clearly shined by ripping Foley's ear off and powerbombing him on concrete. I know I have got to be making some sense here.

Originally Posted by Narcissus CWK, what about this aren't you getting? "Better Wrestler" is nothing more than a title for the thread. Your vote can be based on ANY criteria you'd like. You can call it "Better Professional Wrestler" if you'd like to drive home that this is evaluating them overall as performers and not just specific aspects of their game (ie: Their actual "wrestling" or in-ring skills) It has been said many times that there is no specific criteria for voting. I'll say it again. There is no specific criteria for voting. Stop making me hate myself for being a wrestling fan, please.