|
I get annoyed by this as well, because it is very predictable. You know that the challenger will usually win if he is not a jobber. If they want to keep using this method (which does work on occasion) then you have to have more non title matches where in the champion is still victorious, and of course that does happen from time to time but it is rare. It's an obvious way to set up a match or rematch I guess, pretty simple and lame.
It only really works if the guy who beats the champ in a rung or two lower, then it can make the crowd very hot for that week and the rematch. For instance, If Evan Bourne was to somehow get a clean victory over Miz in a non title match, you wouldn't see that coming. But Mark Henry is obviously going to win and get a small feud out of it.
To me the worst is interference. A and B It only really works if the guy who beats the champ in a rung or two lower, then it can make the crowd very hot for that week and the rematch. For instance, If Evan Bourne was to somehow get a clean victory over Miz in a non title match, you wouldn't see that coming. But Mark Henry winning is obvious.
To me the worst is basic interference. A and B are having a match C comes to the ring with no reason and cost's A the match. Now they are in a feud. I find that really lame and basic. It makes me roll my eyes and switch the station.
|