I completely agree with Rock Bottom.
Taker is one of those rare wrestlers that "put over" someone by having them headline a competitive PPV match with him, regardless if they win or lose.
I don't think any one person is big enough to live up to being "the guy that ended The Undertaker's career" or even being the "Streak Breaker".
I'm not saying that I just want Taker to steam roll through young talent (well..depends which young talent we're talking about here.. but anyway..), I'm saying that Taker has a big enough presence about him where it helps establish stars by just having feuds/matches with him, not necessarily defeating him.
Plus, if someone is to end the streak, it obviously should be a young wrestler, but would WWE or Taker himself feel comfortable handing over his entire legacy to a young performer? I think WWE seems untrustworthy of doing this because of how Lesnar was put over HUGE by the likes of RVD, Rock, Show, Angle, Benoit, and Taker himself, and then after 2 years, he packed up and left the company (I don't blame him, I'm just stating how this could have effected the way WWE pushes young talent up until right now).
|