View Single Post
Old 01-07-2010, 07:34 PM   #1
Londoner
One Of A Kind
 
Londoner's Avatar
 
Posts: 22,178
Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RVDmark View Post
Cena vs Taker and Michaels vs Shameus makes much more sense.

Michaels v Taker was awesome and having another would produce a good match, but the ending has been seen. A bit of unpredictability even if only percieved unpredictability is a neccessity for a good soryline and keeping interest in the match.

Michaels vs Shameus. Michaels will make Sheamus look like a million buck$, Sheamus is young and can therefore take some decent bumps.

Michaels wins the Rumble.

That's what I would do. However my money is on Edge winning the rumble.
Why is HBK V Sheamus logical? They're not feuding in any way atm.
Londoner is offline   Reply With Quote