|
What is the money judging though??? Money can judge which company is having more success. Money can judge how many people saw the match. Money however cannot judge the quality of the match, especially when the people pay in advance before they see the match. Furthermore, great wrestling doesn't equal a great company. Money and exposure equals a great company.
It's pretty much a vicious circle because to get exposure, you need money, and to get money, you need exposure. It's easier to get exposure, but it's a very long process.
I'm curious though, if a fairly large amount of diverse wrestling fans could sit down and come up with a criteria for what makes a match good, do you then think that criteria could be effectively uses to judge matches?
|