Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The CyNick
And I'm not saying money is a good way to judge quality either, but as you said (and now agree with what I'm saying) its the only way to judge because any other measure of quality is meaningless.
|
Money is not a judge of quality because the money is given before the match. Money is a judge of the companies quality, and possibly the drawing ability of the wrestlers... However you can't use something that takes place before the match as a way to judge the quality of something that hasn't happened.
Furthermore, even if you could use money to judge the quality of a match ( which once again, you can't, because money is a factor BEFORE the match happens) you said yourself it's not a good way. Since judging a match by money is inaccurate, it's creating an erroneous image of the match... Even if opinion is subjective, I would trust a subjective analysis before I consult a method that erroneously judges a match.