Thread: Is it better to be a mark?
View Single Post
Old 04-26-2004, 03:25 PM   #39
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BasicThuganomics
Look, I know that wrestling was in the mainstream a few years ago and now it isn't. Wrestling was cool a few years ago because it was really, really good. People (marks) watched it because it was a good product.If Wrestling hadn't been good, then it would have been kool. What made wrestling not be mainstream anymore is that it started to suck, so marks stopped watching it. So obviously they have an opinion of some kind. and I'm not saying that being a mark is better than being a smart and that I wish I had never gone to the internet. In my earlier post I stated that I gained more respect for the business and the wrestlers by knowing what I know over the Internet. But if a mark is enjoying the product then good for them! Nothing wrong with a person enjoying themselves. I am defending them because I don't think there is anything wrong with being a mark. But obviously you seem to think there is something wrong with that, and I disagree.
So by your logic, Bopy Bands and reality TV are really really good, because they're kool and mainstream right now?
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote