Thread: NFL 2009 Season Thread
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2010, 04:49 AM   #5511
Jeritron
Get a poke on
 
Jeritron's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,234
Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Requiem View Post
What about the neg repping? I don't care. lol The fact that you're trying to irk a response from me on the situation is laughable.

The whole argument HASN'T been about statistics, because YOU tried to turn it into an argument about something other than statistics.

I NEVER said the Colts played better football and deserved to win due to the statistics they put up. I stated that statistically, the Colts played better. I then stated that it didn't matter, because the Saints played better when it mattered. Playing better when it matters.. is well... what matters. The Saints won the Super Bowl.

YOU tried to spin it as if I was saying the Colts played better and should have won because of it.

I can repeat that in a hundred different ways, but I guess it will never sink in to your thick head that there was no malice or ill intentions in the original post that started this whole argument.

Still no spin. It will not sink into my head because it's a steaming pile of bullshit.
Coming into the thread and saying The Colts played better (statistically, just so you don't grasp to it), is a bullshit comment. It's an excuse. How can you claim you this after throwing a comment like that in there?

Also, it's false to begin with, so it doesn't even matter.

In other news, you're absurd.


Finally, I thought you were just going to refer me to post 5783 or whatever? I thought that covered everything, and you had nothing left to say to debunk me?
Those were the statistics we were talking about weren't they?

Why, after my last string of posts, do you need to spin more yarns and throw out more red herring to try to get out of this argument?
Surely the all-important post 5783 would take care of this for you if it carried any weight to begin with
Jeritron is offline