Thread: Question: TNA VS WWE
View Single Post
Old 02-28-2010, 10:06 AM   #1
Destor
I am the cheese
 
Destor's Avatar
 
Posts: 51,469
Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Question: TNA VS WWE
Now i'm pretty sure the general idea is that TNA is awful, or at least i think you all say that... i've pegged tpww wrong before and i am out of the loop... SO MAYBE IT's epic good i dunno.

Now IF TNA is awful, and if it's comprised of former used to be's, would be's, and should be's of the WWE then is TNA's present suck a sign of TNA's failure to use talent or the WWE's skill of using the talent? (In your opinion.)

NOW YOU CAN BELEIVE THAT BOTH ARE FACTORS BUT AT SOME POINT ONE HAS TO BE MORE TRUE THAN THE OTHER AND THAT LINE IS WHERE MY INTEREST IS.

"It's both" is an answer only fit for liberal vaginas with no spine...and gingers.

Last edited by Destor; 02-28-2010 at 11:43 AM.
Destor is offline   Reply With Quote