Thread: Question: TNA VS WWE
View Single Post
Old 02-28-2010, 12:44 PM   #18
screech
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
 
screech's Avatar
 
Posts: 23,625
screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Steele View Post
The WWE didn't make Randy Orton a star? I'm fucking appaled at this. They gave Orton the ball way too early and he flopped as a face.
Orton flopped as a face because his character became one that didn't suit him. He became a guy who sucked up to the crowd, and this has been proven to fail with more than just him (Kennedy is another example). He could play a face, just not that kind of face.

To answer the question at hand, I agree with The Show Off. I think it is TNA's failure over WWE's skill in using talent because WWE doesn't use a lot of talent to potential either. They keep people who will hurt them by being successful in the rival promotion. He mentioned Angle, I'll go with Gail Kim. Since returning to the company, she has done virtually nothing. That's a failure on WWE's part (in my opinion).

So to sum up:

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Show Off
So because of WWE's failure you answer has to be TNA's failure.
screech is offline   Reply With Quote