Thread: OnLive: Gaming's Future?
View Single Post
Old 03-13-2010, 09:54 AM   #22
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD View Post
Fail for now, but it'll carve out a niche in a few years - just nothing particularly groundbreaking.
Onlive will need to carve itself out a niche fast or fall by the wayside. In probability, in a few years it will be forgotten.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fignuts View Post
I might get this.

I mean I'll have to see how it runs and stuff first, but they spent 7 years in development for the sole purpose of making streaming games without lag, so I doubt your connection has to be insanely good to use it.

Also, this seems like a really great service for people like me, who are interested in pc games, but don't want to shell out all the money for a crazy rig.
I'm still skeptical on the "lag free" bit. I'm also reticent to pay for a service that hinges entirely on internet connection.

It certainly does sound cool, I'm just remembering all the other promises.

Hey, anyone want to meet me and play some games online on the Phantom?
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote