Yes, you have to crawl before you walk, however how many years have they been crawling?
I'm not saying success is instant. It never is. However, they have made a lot of bad choices over the years. The six sided ring, bad gimmick matches, pushing older people that have no potential as opposed to their own talent, etc etc etc. They COULD be good, great even.... If they just burned down the dead wood. A big name is not always a draw, nor is a big name match. WWE gets ratings for giving us the same stuff week in and week out. TNA, on the other hand, in their attempt to be different and cutting edge they're failing.
My advice to TNA- Be more like WWE. Yes, this will piss off a lot of hardcore fans (all 5 of them) but from a fiscal stand point it should benifit them.
|