Thread: Chairshot to the head? That's a finin'...
View Single Post
Old 03-18-2010, 01:20 AM   #156
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FourFifty View Post
Maybe, not just maybe.... the lack of chair shots to the skull MIGHT increase the longevity... And with less "hardcore" action, we MIGHT see more WRESTLING ON A FUCKING WRESTLING PROGRAM!!!!!
Maybe you'll get a tattoo that represents something other than popcorn philosophy.

Nah, the wrestling's more likely.

I mean, really. Maybe we'll see more wrestling? No. We'll just see more "sports entertainment," while the wrestling moves are further stripped to be safer for their "superstars."

Chair shots are almost completely unrelated to the amount of wrestling in WWE. It not an either/or deal, and hasn't been for ages. We'll see more wrestling only if WWE decides that technical wrestling is somehow a marketable art--Which will happen just after I stop being a snarky misanthrope.

On the other hand, I don't really miss "hardcore" wrestling. I don't really miss blood, either. If there was solid storytelling, compelling characters and good ring work, they could ban all foreign objects and I wouldn't bat an eyelash. what's missing now is the same thing that's been missing for years. banning chair shots won't bring wrestling back to WWE, though.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote