Thread: Is the WWE saving Edge vs HHH?
View Single Post
Old 03-24-2010, 03:28 AM   #43
Jeritron
Get a poke on
 
Jeritron's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,234
Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Jeritron makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise View Post
I had Taker/HBK at 32 but then felt like the other matches were too short, so minute by minute had to take away from it. I really hope it goes over 30 though. I think there being no divas match this year helps show how strong the card is too.

Why didnt they just do 4.5 or even 5 hours? They could have thrown in a diva match or a battle royale in. WM XX was 5 I think
If it was 5 hours, I'd be perfectly fine with a divas match on there. Not a shitty clusterfuck though. I'd actually like to see a Maryse vs Mickie James match to unify those titles. The ends justifies the means.

Also, you probably could have snuck an IC title match on there with a couple of the guys from MITB.

Those would really just be extra filler to reach the 5 hours though. I'd be all for it, since it would be more wrestling entertainment and would allow for a few extra minutes in some of the existing matchups.
But I'm fine with it as is.
Jeritron is offline   Reply With Quote