Thread: The WWE/World Heavyweight Titles and the brand split
View Single Post
Old 04-04-2010, 11:19 AM   #19
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I think both secondary titles look pretty good right now, actually.

But yes, it is confusing how they do that sort of stuff. Of course the actual idea behind it is convenience and where they want guys to be, but it doesn't seem to make perfect sense in storylines. Guru Dave came up with a good way of explaining it. It really depends on where you win the title?

Very early on in the brand split, I remember two guys (might have been Chris Benoit and Eddie Guerrero?) feuding over the Intercontinental Title, and where that belt would be. And there is that ECW Title thing, but that can be explained away by Mr. McMahon's dislike for Bobby Lashley.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote