Quote:
Originally Posted by Narcissus
Screech has said that he's referring to one on one NON-TITLE matches like 9 times now, thus making your example irrelevant. This is a basic wrestling concept here. You book your champion as your top guy until there is a guy to challenge him on a money card. You don't job him out in non-title matches that don't necessarily mean anything.
|
See, this is exactly why wrestling is "dead". Because everyone thinks they know "wrestling" and should be bookers, writers, etc. I'm not saying that the writers are brilliant, but c'mon. You guys need to chill out about little shit like this. And it doesn't matter if it is title or non-title matches, no one is understanding the concept that IM trying to illustrate. The way he won his title is what i am talking about. I'm not saying that he shouldn't have some type of credibilty, i understand where screech is coming from from a "credibility" standpoint. But like i said, the guy won the shit from a guy with "taped up ribs", just got his ass speared, and was barely "conscious" for the "match" they had. If everything was so predictable like you guys make it, it would be boring. (Cena is another story).
A guy who wins the Heisman Trophy in football for like 2 years out of his college career is not going to go into the NFL and dominate or "not lose non-title matches". He is stepping into a WHOLE different level of players/athletes. I mean, its evolution and simple logic. Narc wants to talk about logic, well the Big Show should be winning every god damn match he is put in lol. But he is not, the business is portrayed as "you can lose any night, any time, any show. Be on your A-game and get ready". Swagger is going to do fine as champ, IMO. The guy will "learn" from his mistakes and will not "lose non title matches" as much because he realizes what level he is on now. That is modern day logic about ANYTHING pertaining to a type of "sport" or "Sports Entertainment" for this matter.