Thread: Crowd Reactions
View Single Post
Old 04-16-2010, 06:24 PM   #63
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD View Post
Heh, could have used this action when I myself was commenting on WWE's declining product years ago - only in this case I'm commenting on the lame-ass fans who wouldn't know quality if WWE did a Attitude Era style show one night. Crowd would still be dead, TPWW would flip, though.

Americans suck, get over it.
I'm not the one making up excuses for while a flailing product is doing poorly. I'm pretty sure I'm not the one who needs to get over it.

As for your claim, Austin's return was a peak in ratings in the middle of poor ratings, and a hotter crowd. I mean, your argument is literally and demonstrably wrong. introducing just one element of the Attitude Era, one person people gave a shit about, was enough to get a bigger response.

Strike three, Kal.

It's almost like the thesis that higher "quality" = better crowd reactions holds up to scrutiny.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote