Thread: "Switch" week...
View Single Post
Old 04-19-2010, 11:58 AM   #10
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,523
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight View Post
Or as Noid would put it, "Kane Knight thinks it will never, ever, ever happen!"
LOL, why would I put it like that? That doesn't mention Val Venis.

I have thought about something like a one-week roster switch before, actually. I think it would be an interesting experiment. Creatively, I'd love it -- but would it achieve anything business-wise? It might give the guys going to SmackDown! some bigger stars to cheer, and it might give the SmackDown! guys some more exposure, I guess. It'd be the WWE product supporting itself in no really massive way.

But creatively is how the idea becomes really interesting. Do the writing teams remain the same? It'd be interesting to see Michael Hayes either book the RAW guys in the SmackDown! slot or the SmackDown! guys in the RAW slot. I believe that the RAW roster has just as much talent as the SmackDown! roster (although RAW does not have the abs of John Morrison), so I'd be really intrigued to see how they are used under Michael Hayes' book.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote