Quote:
Originally Posted by The Show Off
The difference between TNA and WWE is this...
(and I'm speaking in broad strokes not specifically)
WWE makes sense but in generally bland.
TNA doesn't make sence all the time but is usually intresting (if not down right silly).
|
I do try and watch as many TNA PPV matches as I can, the booking just drives me mad. I'm a big fan of a lot of the roster. It's just they can't make you care about a match before it happens. I was geniunely excited for most of the matches at Wrestlemania by WWE build up. TNA has never really had that effect (Apart from Joe vs Angle) because they have no decent build up and just throw out things randomly. Usually the PPV matches have been given away for free
and getting back on topic. That's what i find so underwhelming about RVD winning the title. Where's the story? Where's the Heroes journey? We've just not been made to care about it.
If i could have (generally) WWE build up with TNA matches I'd be a happy man