Commentators: An Inquisition of Public Opinions
I don't hate King, and I've always kinda liked Cole in general. I do not think they are the best, but I think they're "o.k.". I certainly wouldn't fire them -- but I can see/hear moments when I can't help but take notice of hitches; awkward pauses or weird comments; contradicting each other, etc. I don't feel the need to remove them, but I can totally understand why some fans might have complaints.
Contrariwise, I find the team of Striker and Grisham to be much more entertaining and they're a part of SmackDown to which I look forward. they appear to have a friendly chemistry so that they can work well together -- even when Striker supports the less than popular competitors.
Here's what I don't get: What gripes do people actually have with Striker and/or Grisham? I may simply not be looking for them, or willfully ignoring certain flaws. So please, explain to me why either or both of these men are bad at their jobs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Capitano Gatisto
BCWWF, Afterlife is correct...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triple A
What a handsome young man
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Steele
What the fuck happened to you in your childhood? I thought you were just an artsy fartsy type dude, but you are a fucking fruit loop.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool
Afterlife is a king among men
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooler Tom Schuler
Afterlife seems like a "pretty cool guy". I would exchange stories with him over beer if given the opportunity.
|
|