Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SuperSlim
It was perfect with just Shane and Paul but they totally screwed it up adding Steph to ECW of all places. She did not have the look nor attitude to be ECW. Another McMahon feud. Took somethin that coulda been the most memorable and awesome thing to ever happen in wrestling history to a complete piece of crap
|
My sentiment exactly.
Shane McMahon as WCW owner was a good idea. After all, Shane (despite the inconsistencies of the McMahons as characters) always seemed to have an underlying theme of showing up his old man. The set up of having Shane McMahon on Nitro was also cool.
Paul Heyman
SHOULD have been the one to lead ECW, not Stephanie. That was the lamest reason to put Steph back on television. Stephanie, before she "inflated", was only really good for a female version of "X-Pac heat", especially then.
and then the alliance of WCW and ECW...that was just a bad idea. If they were going to be heels, it should have been the angle equivalent of a "Triple Threat" match. WWF's competition should have been made to look like it really was in trouble with WCW (with Booker T at the helm of the wrestlers) and ECW (with RVD at the helm) disrupting their shows.
if Austin was going to leave WWF angle-wise and join "The Alliance" as a heel, he ought to have done the ultimate sin: pull an Alundra Blayze and trash the WWF Title, then forcibly take the WCW belt.