Thread: First Ghostbusters, now this?
View Single Post
Old 06-11-2010, 10:26 AM   #11
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeritron View Post
The chances of it sucking are high, but probably not as likely as they would have been a few years ago.
I feel like the Ghostbusters game may have shown developers the way in terms of how to do these things. If it's well done and plays to the fanbase, it can work.
The idea of these games being actual sequels to the old movies is great.
I know I'll get bitched at for pointing out the obvious, but one good game does not a pattern make. It's not even the first tie-in title to have done well, but they're few and far between. It's probably better to enjoy Ghostbusters for the rarity it is, rather than something that even incrementally raises the possibility of this sucking.

Personally, I'm hoping for the best (Or, as the TPWW team would put it, i
hate BttF and hope it fails), but I think I'll enjoy it more if I don't measure it by the standards set by another game.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote