Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PureHatred
No, but you're the only one going on and on anytime mentions another possible use for Steiner how those are bad ideas becuse he's "still on your TV."
Read the thread again. Rob made some really good points on what Steiner could do for the WWE. This is another example of the writers not being able to come up wth angles that properly make use of the talent.
Scott isn't Goldberg. He can be very good on the mic. He's willing to put people over. If his is true, the WWE is firing him w/o even making an atempt to use him. Pretty dumb.
|
Again, this is your opinion, and the opinion of others, and you're entitled to it. Do I seriously think Steiner on Smackdown would be a bad idea? Maybe not. There. I said it. But I just don't see what's so great about him. He was great at one time, yes. But that doesn't mean he still is. He's made his contribution. Do you want him to work forever? C'mon. It was suggested they put him on Smackdown, to be squashed, so that somebody else can be built up. That's an option, yes, but I think there are better ways to push someone than to stick him in the ring with Steiner. That's just my opinion.