Thread: 2D vs 3D Platformers
View Single Post
Old 07-05-2010, 06:05 PM   #9
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooияakeя™ View Post
It depends. If it's done well, it can work well.

Like Pandemonium on the PSX, that was a 3D sonic. You could only go L/R and Up/Down. Stuck to an area. Whereas on the DC it was like Sonic Adventure had gone all mad and Sonic was no longer a platformer.

I think 2D was best. So many of 'em too. I think there is a market for 3D ones, just needs to be done right.
Pandemonium I don't consider 3D. It's TECHNICALLY 3D, but it's 3D in the sense NSMB is 3D. I was talking more in terms of the plane.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote