Thread: At what point does someone become a true main eventer in your eyes?
View Single Post
Old 07-17-2010, 02:12 PM   #3
Schlomey
Black Sheep Jew
 
Schlomey's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,859
Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)Schlomey has 75,000 or more rep points (75,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blak23 View Post
the term "IT" is kinda sketchy to me it's like saying "work rate" imo its such an abstract term.

I don't think this new gen is missing anything major just a bit more polish is needed. if i said the new generation (i.e. Miz, Morrison, Kofi, Ziggler etc) they all have everything but the great finisher. punk is the greatest example of this to me if punk kept using the anaconda vice he wouldn't have been able to get as over as well as he is with the GTS


Looking at your list and comparing them to the current main eventers and the main eventers of my childhood...I just don't see it at all.


Morrison over Cena/Hogan/Hart/Michaels/Taker - no way

Miz could become THE guy

Kofi is very talented and very over but as we have seen before when he was on RAW, it takes WWE writers and fans all of 2 seconds to forget him.

Ziggler - A strong mid card talent he will always be and that is not a put down.



I just don't see hardly any of the fresh faces of WWE reaching the heights of the ones I listed above.....Could be wrong (and probably am) but currently there is NOBODY even close to a Taker/HBK/HHH.
Schlomey is offline   Reply With Quote