View Single Post
Old 07-19-2010, 03:00 PM   #17
M-A-G
Higher. Further. Faster.
 
M-A-G's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,197
M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Bite your tongue, triaD. Besides, it's not like there's major uber-cash to be made out of it so the only real reason it would be remade is just for the sake of remaking it. I didn't get a chance to see this film until I was, like, 14 or so and the message and themes of the movie weren't lost on me. Anyone can watch it now and still grasp what it was trying to do. That's what makes great movies great. People don't need an update when the original is right there. And that's the key word: original. All of these remade films are based on someone's ORIGINAL work. They weren't updates. They weren't the product of someone saying, "Hey, let's have a contemporary take on this". Like I said, it would just be remaking for the sake of it. Hollywood needs to get its head out of its ass and start making the classics for tomorrow.
M-A-G is offline   Reply With Quote