View Single Post
Old 07-22-2010, 12:34 AM   #49
FakeLaser
continental drift
 
FakeLaser's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,731
FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)FakeLaser makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeritron View Post
It's still new material though. I think material and creators are two different things.
A lot of people will feel comfortable with proven directors, writers and actors. This has almost always been the case.
Actors longer than directors.

With Hitchcock and Spielberg the birth of the namebrand director became a part of the film industry, but they still brought new material to the table.
In this situation the moviegoers and studios have the benefit of tapping into a brand and giving something new at the same time.
I agree it's "new material." All that I'm saying is it's not like Inception was some movie by some unknown director with an unknown cast that blew up at the box-office strictly because it was "new material."
FakeLaser is offline   Reply With Quote