|
"Constructive Criticism" is all good - even if there is very little of it in some of the reviews - but I find it's always a little reassuring to mention stuff that you did like (if anything) otherwise the hardwork just seems like it's been for nought.
Thing is, it's difficult to rebute or explain your moves without letting everyone know which show is yours.
One thing I do wish is that people stopped focusing on the "name value" of the characters (e.g. I'm not interested in Segment A cos I can't stand Wrestler A". Our rosters are based on a draft, we didn't get everyone we wanted to. We can rue about not getting who we wanted but our job is to write a good storyline for whoever we did get. IMO, judge the story/angle not the character.
There are some excellent rosters amongst the shows but if the writing is shit then there's no point having Angle, Miz, Punk, etc.
|