Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanso
"Havign more titles makes it better for more people to be champion and make it big"
Explain every over wrestler in the 80s and 90s?
There are alot of shit posts in this thread.
|
Feuds have been character driven, yes, but theres still a certain level of prestige associated with holding the big belt. Considering the youth movement in the WWE, the ability and opportunity for these guys to hold titles does something for their credibility.
Fact of the matter is that the brand split does exist and the roster is pretty damn big...to establish, and to maintain, the main event talent, having a "top" title on each show makes sense.
Just because you don't agree w/ the viewpoint doesn't make them shit posts. Civility would be appreciated cap.