View Single Post
Old 08-31-2010, 01:11 PM   #7
Furious Beardsley
Blargh...
 
Furious Beardsley's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,519
Furious Beardsley has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Furious Beardsley has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Furious Beardsley has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Furious Beardsley has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Furious Beardsley has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Furious Beardsley has a good deal of rep (10,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by george View Post
having one belt between the two is going to suck.
That's how it was before they acquired WCW. They had one major belt for the entire company, along with the IC title, Tag Team, and Women's. They had the Light Heavyweight title for awhile as well.

But all the talent was working most shows.

With them going back to one roster instead of doing the draft every year, would allow for more feuds, like some have said, and require the writers to actually think. New tag teams could be formed with a single roster. The storylines could actually have some build-up again to the next pay-per-view.

All that said, I am for a unification of the WWE/WHC titles. Leave the IC and US belts alone, the tag belt merger was good, and merging the 2 women's titles is good, because the Diva's belt is ugly as all hell anyways, well they both are, but that's beside the point.

Getting rid of the brand split could be a rebirth of WWE that we are looking for it to be highly enjoyable and a little less predictable again. With new stars being forced to be created.

On the other side it could screw things up even worse if it overwhelms the creative team...it could into a much larger TNA with all this talent and no clue what do with it. Which isn't far from how it is now, where they push the same 4-5 guys and don't touch the mid-carders.
Furious Beardsley is offline   Reply With Quote