Thread: How would've you booked the InVasion?
View Single Post
Old 09-05-2010, 03:48 PM   #30
Next Big Thing
 
Next Big Thing's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,839
Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguakate View Post
They should've definitely brought the BIG NAMES over to WWF as leaders of the Invasion, instead of bringing "lesser name guys". If they would've brought Goldberg, Steiner, Nash, Hall, etc, it would've been explosive, and who knows how the wrestling industry would've changed.

But to make the Invasion a McMahon family feud was one of the worst decisions ever. Made the fact that WCW was "invading" WWF totally secondary.
1) It wasn't possible because of the contract situations.

2) Vince never ever intended on any WCW guys attaining any major form of success over his guys.

The NWO, easily top 3 stables of all time in it's earliest form, was made to look like clowns from day 1. DDP, who would have been a great babyface, was made to look like a creepy stalker and fed to Taker. Steiner and Goldberg came and went and the only reason Hogan thrived is because he's Hogan.

In my opinion, the Invasion angle turned out just as McMahon wanted it to. WCW talent looking like jobbers to the WWE guys.
Next Big Thing is offline   Reply With Quote