Thread: Is Twitter Good for Wrestling?
View Single Post
Old 09-07-2010, 10:57 AM   #9
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rated rjo View Post
If Dixie wants to put herself on TV, that makes her a performer just like the rest of the guys and gals in the locker room. So when I say talent, I count her in there too - although in her case, I guess the term should probably be used more loosely.
That's trying to shoehorn her in, however. The other guys, yeah (Though Jarrett makes more sense than the Pope), but Dixie is still promoting as a promoter, even if she does so poorly.

TNA's fan feedback is frustrating. They spend all that time connecting with the community and then ignore it. Dixie and Bisch have even argued with fans over it, which seems to miss the point, but whatever.

WWE is doing it a sa perfunctory thing. They want to remain relevant, but they still have a very anti-internet sentiment. A lot of the disparity you see comes from a dated mindset trying to remain contemporary. I don't doubt WWE has some level of "buyer's remorse" here, but they're a pretty controlling company, so I'm not sure how much damage can be done.

Twitter is just a medium, though. It's the use that's good or bad, and I'm not sure it's either all in all.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote