Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowden
Why would they do Sheamus/Taker for the title? The streak match is always a huge draw, and I don't see any reason to use two big bullets (along with the title unification) in the same match.
Sheamus/Taker can book itself, so can the unification. Keep em separate.
|
I think they feel a need to try to top what they have done in the last two Wrestlemanias.
They also added the stipulation to make it Streak Vs. Career last time. So, they are simply adding another stipulation.
This would be the biggest deal in Wrestlemania for a long time to come. This would change the very nature of how WWE runs. It would probably mean the end of Brand Extension (finally.)
Why not make it the Undertaker who unifies the titles? Why not make it at the biggest night of the WWE year? Also it's against somebody who has a very unique look and who is getting over big time fella.
The only problem that I see arising is what does this mean for the winner of the Royal Rumble? Does Taker win the Rumble, and then win at Elimination Chamber too? Does Sheamus really keep the title all the way until Wrestlemania?
This would be a serious amount of long-term booking and I'm all in favor for it.