Thread: Question about Benoit in 2000
View Single Post
Old 05-15-2004, 12:59 AM   #16
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The CyNick
The point is they pissed away money, and could have had another main eventer, which would have been helpful while business was going down.
At the time, The Rock and Triple H were dominating the main-event scene (and with the impending returns of Austin and Taker), it would've been those 4.

HOWEVER - I think the fans were far more receptive towards Jericho and Angle.

While I believe that the WWE should have created new main-eventers in year 2000, I do not believe that Benoit should've been one of them (atleast not at the time). Those two NEW spots should have gone to Jericho and Angle.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote