Thread: No compete clauses
View Single Post
Old 11-27-2010, 12:52 AM   #4
SlickyTrickyDamon
Quark is Less Impressed.
 
SlickyTrickyDamon's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,371
SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultra Mantis View Post
TNA don't have the clause, mainly because it's not cost effective for them to pay guys for an extra 90 days guarenteed. A lot of TNA talent work on a pay-per-appearance contract, those who are not on guarenteed money contracts can even work for any company while under contract as long as it doesnt clash with TNA's schedule and is a company approved by management (ie. not WWE or ROH).
BUT the appearance can't be put on television or be part of a DVD that is sold. Dixie Carter said that on her YouShoot live interview. So, basically they can only do house shows for leagues that TNA approves of.
SlickyTrickyDamon is offline   Reply With Quote