Thread: Is it wrong for the WWE to be PG?
View Single Post
Old 11-27-2010, 07:38 PM   #10
itsmeJD
Triple A's best friend!
 
itsmeJD's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,781
itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)itsmeJD has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
I started watching when I was probably 5, which would be around 87-88 during the "cartoon" era of characters. I don't think it's wrong of WWE to be PG. It brings in advertisers and markets to those wanting to buy and wear merchandise. It's not as if this is the first time they've ever gone "PG" so to speak. Not to mention I have a 5 year old myself and if it weren't I'd have to listen to my wife bitch about the language so at least he and I can watch in peace.
itsmeJD is offline   Reply With Quote