Thread: Is it wrong for the WWE to be PG?
View Single Post
Old 11-28-2010, 07:18 PM   #27
XL
Feeling Oof-y
 
XL's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,152
XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigslimjj View Post
Vince is roping in new,young, domestic and international viewers.Viewers that won't remember the attitude era. Fans that didn't watch Benoit,Eddie,Pillman etc. Fans that don't get online and know every in and out of the wrestling buisness already. In a few years WWE will get rid of the PG and be more adult once the new fans start becoming adults. At least it seems like the plan. It's like the second version of 1988. A remake if you will.
Never understood that theory myself.

It's not like the number of children is finite. There will always be kids for WWE to target, the majority of which will continue to watch regardless (as we all do for the most part) and new kids wil JOIN the audience.

The way it's put across is as if WWE targets one generation at a time. Get em when they're 7 and we'll pander to their tastes as that group grow up?
XL is offline   Reply With Quote