Thread: RIP Hell In A Cell?
View Single Post
Old 12-02-2010, 05:39 PM   #3
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteyford View Post
Even the shitty PPVs turn a profit though. I agree less PPVS and a longer build between them could only help the product and eventually lead to more buys, but as long as the existing ones are profitable why would Vince change it.
They'd have to take the loss and look to the future. And the numbers are getting REALLY down, in the 120k range. At that point, can't be making THAT big of a profit because I think they only get like $7 per PPV or something. Probably really off with that but I'm pretty sure they get less than 50%.

Another option would be to keep 12 (13 PPVs is stupid, especially when it forces a two week build for a PPV) but lower the the lower tier ones to like $30-$35 like the old In Your Houses were.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote