Thread: NFL 2010 Season Thread
View Single Post
Old 12-16-2010, 11:56 PM   #2971
DrA
 
Posts: 24,527
DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickyTrickyDamon View Post
I took a few minutes to look over the divisions and I feel I have the proper reallignment for the AFC. I checked over the NFC and I didn't see any glaring mistakes or geographical abnormalities like there are in the AFC (Indy=South?! South of what? A little South of North ?)

AFC East:

Patriots, Jets, Bills, and Baltimore. Three power house teams maybe making the competition a little bit too much. It would make for some great football except for the games with the Bills.

AFC North:

Steelers, Indy, Browns, Bengals. Two powerhouse teams plus two teams for them to feast on.

South:

Texans, Miami, Titans and Jaguars: Miami joins the proper division since they are one of the southiest teams in the league. No real powerhouse teams so there will always be heavy compeition to be the least shittiest teams. Keeping these jobbers in one division also leaves the other divisions with better TV ratings and matchups.

West:

Chiefs, Broncos, Raiders, Chargers: No change. Division is always full of competition and it always changes on what teams are competing.
You do realize that teams tend to get better and worse over time right?
DrA is offline