View Single Post
Old 01-07-2011, 03:45 PM   #10527
Eklipse
BrushYo Mouf Like Colgate
 
Eklipse's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,645
Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Eklipse has a good deal of rep (10,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAdamEvansFan View Post
Just log off please.

The is no reason to put Triple H vs Undertaker. That'd be a awful match for various reasons.

1. Both are middle superstars who take in face and heat from the crowd.
2. Both are getting older and need no getting over each other.
3. Neither can really wrestle.
4. Triple H can't be seen as a heel as the fans turned him twice in the past 10 years to face.
5. Triple H has a responsiblity to put over Sheamus at Wrestlemania just as Undertaker with Barrett.


Btw, Barrett doesn't need his cronies anymore. He can bring his own heat now and I think he would do a good program.

You have potential great future faces in Miz, Morrison, and DiBiase so it's imperative to put over such new heels like Barrett and Sheamus.
Wow...really?

First off...face vs heel in all matches hasnt been done in years.
HBK vs Taker at past 2 'Manias have both been faces.
Sheamus and Barrett are both as over as they need to be at this point in their careers.
And who the fuck are you to say HHH and Taker cant wrestle but Barrett can? Fuck you buddy. Your whole statement is shit.
Eklipse is offline