|
Xero, I know you and I have discussed this in past threads, mostly one's where I've been ranting on the writing/flaws of WWE.
IMO, the title's should never be above anyone who is a legitimate full time performer, and sadly, I feel the performers themselves are and have been above the world titles for quite a while. The world title should always be the primary focus of the shows and just because someone was once a main eventer, doesn't mean that they always have to be in the world title hunt year round either.
To me, the writers have made being a WWE "superstar" and performing for the "WWE Universe", the be all end all and every superstar's lifelong dream and goal, and as long as they're doing that, they don't have any other true "ambitions" like winning a world title. It used to be the norm and understood that every superstar was there to "compete" and work their way up to winning the world title, even if you knew deep down that some guys just never would make it above mid card status.
|