View Single Post
Old 01-25-2011, 08:09 PM   #3
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla View Post
Why does a champion have to be threatening, though? He's a cunning guy who is at least pretty compotent in the ring...he won the Money in the Bank contract, and that felt believeable...he has a diehard sidekick willing to do anything for him...sounds like he could easily win the belt to me.

He was pretty credible already, having a super long U.S. Title run and a great tag title run with The Big Show. Just because he didn't ever beat Cena in a squash match doesn't make him a bad title candidate.
He has done the whole "cunning guy who gets a little edge on his opponents with it" thing well. When I say "threatening", it doesn't necessarily mean he's intimidating or anything. It just means he can beat anyone anytime. And he's starting to come into that to me. I just think he should have been a bit more entrnched in that Cena-Orton scene and hit that level BEFORE winning the title as opposed to the way he is doing it now.

I can't really see him main eventing a WrestleMania though. I feel like if you have to do a quick title change to get the belt off someone so they aren't main eventing WrestleMania, then you need to not put the title on them yet. It's been done too much and it's ridiculous.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote