Thread: John Cena vs Reality, bad for kids?
View Single Post
Old 01-29-2011, 06:40 PM   #19
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Different product. Can you honestly look at today's product and the product of 2000 and say "yes, these are exactly the same"? Absolutely not. The content is a sharp contrast to one another.

I will, however, admit that WWE DID market to a younger audience during the Attitude Era. But that doesn't take away from the fact that there were warnings and the ratings were in place.

If anything, I think some of the stuff WWE put out 10 years ago should have had an M rating. They treaded the line A LOT of the time.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote