Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BCWWF
I am sick and tired of all this bullshit. Oklahoma was clearly dominant throughout the whole season, just one loss to a really good team in their final game shouldn't overshadow their ass kicking of every other team they played.
And I am sick and tired of people bitching about the BCS system. It is a computer that decides, based on the teams stats and the teams they have played stats. So if Oklahoma does amazing in a really good conference but loses their last game, the coaches may have a bias or an opinion, but who in the hell are the coaches to say? I stand by the BCS system because it is all based on statistic, not opinion.
|
Does anyone still remember how Oklahoma domanated Texas, #6 in the BCS btw. USC has averaged 40 something points a game, but other than Washington St. who have they beat. USC is not a clear #1 in the polls. The BCS, as much as I hate it, is an improvement over the old system. With the old system in place, USC would be in the Rose Bowl, LSU would be playing Florida St. in the Suger Bowl, and Oklahoma would be playing in the Cotton Bowl. Without the BCS there could be three team deserving a national title, after the bowls games.