Quote:
Originally Posted by Xero
WWE might actually have grounds to sue over that, honestly. It's definitely not under "parody". It's blatant rip-off, and they never showed who it was. Could say they're misleading fans into thinking it's The Undertaker.
I don't think WWE will do anything, because all it'll do is bring attention to TNA, but I think they have the grounds.
|
No log cabin but metal stairs instead. No fire,no lawsuit. This totally falls under the "Scary Movie" parody rules. You can't sue over a thunder storm. If anyone knows what WWE can sue for it's Hogan and Bischoff(toothpicks anyone?) This thread is now 3 pages long. If they were marketiing to the internet fans I think the shit worked. Plus WWE stole this video first.They may own the footage now.But they fuckin stole it first.