Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteyford
I like that TNA acknowledges that they are not the sole wrestling company in the world, WWE tends to either completely ignore other companys or refer to them as the Indys/Mexico/Japan or other generic terms, but TNA should only mention them in terms of former WCW/ECW/IWGP title holder or establishing past relationships/feuds.
|
I agree here, and I do think WWE gives the shaft to the past when it's not a past they own. If the promotion isn't under their umbrella, they tend not to acknowledge them. While I don't agree with it, it's their right. They like to keep themselves in a bubble, and honestly, it's good for business when a company is their size.