View Single Post
Old 02-26-2011, 11:04 PM   #5
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
What does Goldberg really bring to the table outside of a "lol it's Atlanta/WCW" pop? It's not like he didn't work for WWE for a fucking year, which completely and utterly bombed, partially because WCW was dead for two years and his heat had already died down. Two years after the fact. It's now ten years after the fact.

I honestly feel that Goldberg would bring in a handful of buys at best. And why would you put him with someone like Sheamus to squash him? And if he's not doing his trademark squash (which is all he's really good at) why bring him in at all, outside of a HOF induction?

And outside of Nash and Booker, there's really no high profile WCW guys they could bring in. And even at that, both (and 90% of other guys, like Hogan, Hall, Bischoff and Steiner) had been in WWE within the last ten years. Back to beating a dead horse, Sting was the only one to really generate buzz.

The only thing I really see being done with the WCW gimmick in terms of a match, if at all, is a WCW Battle Royal.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote